M. Finet

32 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

M. Finet
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Internal Medicine 72
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 153
  • Physiology 137
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 63
  • Biochemistry 22
Replace Jocelyne Condo with:
Jocelyne Condo France
Stuart Kupfer United States
Victoria Kolb‐Bachofen Germany
Shizu Aikawa Japan
Maria Giovanna Valente Italy
Michèle Heimburger France
Takahisa Deguchi Japan
Silke Becker United Kingdom
Lan Xu China
Bastianina Zanda Italy
M. Finet relative to Jocelyne Condo France Jocelyne Condo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Jocelyne Condo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Finet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Finet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Finet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Finet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Finet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Finet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Finet. The network helps show where M. Finet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Finet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Finet Line = papers co-authored together M. Finet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198962
2 199858
3 199551
4 198736
5 200132
6 198529
7 198428
8 198326
9 199812
10 198911
11 199811
12
Inotropic effect and binding sites of ouabain to rat heart.
198211
13 19978
14 19868
15 20126
16 19995
17 19995
18 20035
19
The Inotropic Action of Bay K-8644 in Rat Isolated Atria and Ventricles
19844
20 19974

About M. Finet

M. Finet is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology and Physiology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (5 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (4 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (3 papers) and Urticaria and Related Conditions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (72 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (153 citations), Physiology (137 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (63 citations) and Biochemistry (22 citations). M. Finet has collaborated with scholars based in France, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Théophile Godfraind, T Godfraind, Gilberto De Nucci, John R. Vane, M. Perrot-Applanat, Karine Cohen-Solal, Edwin Milgröm, François Noël, George H. Khoury and Rémy Hanf. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, European Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Journal of Biomechanics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact