M. Feely
Impact in
- Family Practice top 1%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Medication Adherence and Compliance 12
-
- Epilepsy research and treatment 14
- Co-authors
- Thomas Pullar (12 shared papers)Jeremy R.M. Haigh (7 shared papers)J. Paul Gent (4 shared papers)N. Callaghan (6 shared papers)Pamela M Crawford (1 shared paper)Alistair Hay (2 shared papers)Günter Krämer (1 shared paper)Philip G Wiles (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (9 papers)The Lancet (4 papers)Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (4 papers)Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (2 papers)Life Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustria
In The Last Decade
M. Feely
47 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Family Practice 238
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 79
- Psychiatry and Mental health 368
- Pharmacology 118
- Internal Medicine 24
Countries citing papers authored by M. Feely
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Feely's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Feely with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Feely more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Feely
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Feely. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Feely. The network helps show where M. Feely may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Feely, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 147 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 118 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 88 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 81 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 74 | |
| 6 | 1978 | 68 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 59 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 57 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 53 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 45 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 44 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 42 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 38 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 37 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 36 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 32 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 20 | |
| 18 | 1980 | 19 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 17 |
About M. Feely
M. Feely is a scholar working on Family Practice, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Toxicology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (14 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (12 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Synthesis and pharmacology of benzodiazepine derivatives (2 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers) and Neurology and Historical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (238 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (79 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (368 citations), Pharmacology (118 citations) and Internal Medicine (24 citations). M. Feely has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Pullar, Jeremy R.M. Haigh, J. Paul Gent, N. Callaghan, Pamela M Crawford, Alistair Hay, Günter Krämer, Philip G Wiles, Alan H. Guberman and A. J. Birtwell. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, The Lancet, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica and Life Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.