M. E. Stoll
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 2%
- Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- NMR spectroscopy and applications
Papers in
- Spectroscopy 13
- Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications 13
- Molecular spectroscopy and chirality 2
-
- NMR spectroscopy and applications 9
- Co-authors
- R. W. Vaughan (7 shared papers)Alexander J. Vega (5 shared papers)Michael Mehring (2 shared papers)Elmar K. Wolff (2 shared papers)William E. Geiger (3 shared papers)R. B. Saillant (1 shared paper)T. Cole (1 shared paper)Isabella Hyla‐Kryspin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Chemical Physics (5 papers)Review of Scientific Instruments (2 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (2 papers)Physical review. B, Condensed matter (1 paper)Organometallics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyItaly
In The Last Decade
M. E. Stoll
17 papers receiving 557 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Spectroscopy 361
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 245
- Biophysics 76
- Catalysis 38
- Materials Chemistry 233
Countries citing papers authored by M. E. Stoll
This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. Stoll more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. Stoll
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. Stoll. The network helps show where M. E. Stoll may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside M. E. Stoll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1976 | 95 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 58 | |
| 3 | 1974 | 51 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 45 | |
| 6 | 1977 | 42 | |
| 7 | 1977 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 38 | |
| 9 | 1978 | 30 | |
| 10 | 1981 | 30 | |
| 11 | 1980 | 29 | |
| 12 | 1982 | 25 | |
| 13 | 1981 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1976 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1978 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1981 | 4 |
About M. E. Stoll
M. E. Stoll is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 17 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (13 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (9 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (6 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins (1 paper) and Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (361 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (245 citations), Biophysics (76 citations), Catalysis (38 citations) and Materials Chemistry (233 citations). M. E. Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include R. W. Vaughan, Alexander J. Vega, Michael Mehring, Elmar K. Wolff, William E. Geiger, R. B. Saillant, T. Cole, Isabella Hyla‐Kryspin, Rolf Gleiter and Warren J. Oldham. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Organometallics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.