M. de Groot

709 citations
11 papers · 474 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 4
    • S100 Proteins and Annexins 1
    • Ion channel regulation and function 1

M. de Groot

10 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

M. de Groot
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Genetics 160
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 110
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 70
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 64
  • Clinical Psychology 64
Replace Ulrike Lengler with:
Ulrike Lengler Germany
Clare L. van Eyk Australia
Amira Masri Jordan
Richard E. Dowell United States
M. J. Valstar Netherlands
Nicole Law Canada
Helen Young Australia
F. Laroussinie France
J. P. M. Evans United Kingdom
Angela Peron Italy
M. de Groot relative to Ulrike Lengler Germany Ulrike Lengler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ulrike Lengler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. de Groot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. de Groot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. de Groot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. de Groot. The network helps show where M. de Groot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. de Groot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. de Groot Line = papers co-authored together M. de Groot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2011133
2 201398
3 201364
4 201155
5 201035
6 201331
7 201327
8 201619
9 20097
10
High Sv2A Expression in Tumor and Peritumoral Tissue in Glioma Patients with Epilepsy Is Associated with High Efficacy of Levetiracetam
20104
11
Efficacy and Tolerability of Levetiracetam Monotherapy in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors and Epilepsy
20101

About M. de Groot

M. de Groot is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (1 paper), Brain Metastases and Treatment (1 paper), S100 Proteins and Annexins (1 paper) and Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (160 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (110 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (70 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (64 citations) and Clinical Psychology (64 citations). M. de Groot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jaap C. Reijneveld, Jan J. Heimans, Eleonora Aronica, Boudewijn J. Kollen, Martin Klein, Linda Douw, Florien Boele, Hinke F. van Thuijl, Wilmy Cleijne and Wim G.M. Spliet. Their work appears in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, Journal of Neuro-Oncology, NeuroImage, Neurology and Brain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact