M. D. Smith

671 citations
10 papers · 480 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

M. D. Smith

9 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

M. D. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 303
  • Atmospheric Science 71
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
  • Aerospace Engineering 60
  • Earth-Surface Processes 11
Replace Kevin G. Devine with:
Kevin G. Devine United Kingdom
J. R. Johnson United States
I. Abrrey Monreal United States
Zhuchang Zhan United States
M. J. Richter United States
Chandra Wickramasinghe United Kingdom
Andrew J. Stewart United States
Yu. V. Nikolsky Russia
David W. Clarke United States
Clayton Smith United States
M. D. Smith relative to Kevin G. Devine United Kingdom Kevin G. Devine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Kevin G. Devine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. D. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. D. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. D. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. D. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. D. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. D. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. D. Smith. The network helps show where M. D. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside M. D. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. D. Smith Line = papers co-authored together M. D. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2015206
2 2002126
3 199751
4 199544
5 197924
6 199311
7 196510
8 19826
9
The Ortho Problem Solver
19842
10 20240

About M. D. Smith

M. D. Smith is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Organic Chemistry, General Health Professions, Pharmaceutical Science and Epidemiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Planetary Science and Exploration (3 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (2 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (1 paper), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper), Ethics in medical practice (1 paper), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper) and Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (303 citations), Atmospheric Science (71 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations), Aerospace Engineering (60 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (11 citations). M. D. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include A. T. Tokunaga, Alain Khayat, Hans Ulrich Käufl, Th. Encrenaz, R. E. Novak, G. L. Villanueva, M. J. Mumma, P. Hartogh, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun and Nicholas J. White. Their work appears in journals such as Icarus, Organometallics, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact