M. Chabot

92 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

M. Chabot
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 575
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 813
  • Radiation 198
  • Spectroscopy 377
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 219
Replace B M McLaughlin with:
B M McLaughlin United States
G. Peach United Kingdom
N. Djurić United States
K. Butler Germany
B. Van Zyl United States
V P Shevelko Russia
Sveneric Johansson Sweden
K. Wien Germany
M. A. Bautista United States
Kazuhiro Sakimoto Japan
M. Chabot relative to B M McLaughlin United States B M McLaughlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
B M McLaughlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Chabot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Chabot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Chabot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Chabot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Chabot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Chabot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Chabot. The network helps show where M. Chabot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Chabot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Chabot Line = papers co-authored together M. Chabot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994115
2 201168
3 201567
4 201358
5 199257
6 202147
7 199444
8 200441
9 201836
10 201534
11 201931
12 199529
13 199226
14 202025
15 200025
16 200224
17 200724
18 201823
19 201323
20 199022

About M. Chabot

M. Chabot is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Spectroscopy, Computational Mechanics and Radiation, having authored 93 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (53 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (35 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (23 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (22 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (18 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (12 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (12 papers) and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (575 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (813 citations), Radiation (198 citations), Spectroscopy (377 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (219 citations). M. Chabot has collaborated with scholars based in France, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include E. Dartois, D. Gardès, K. Wohrer, H. Rothard, P. Boduch, Alicja Domaracka, K. Béroff, S. Della‐Negra, G. Maynard and Thomas Pino. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics and Physical Review A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact