C. Fleurier

47 papers receiving 812 citations

Peers

C. Fleurier
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 276
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 599
  • Mechanics of Materials 446
  • Spectroscopy 181
  • Radiation 75
Replace K. N. Koshelev with:
K. N. Koshelev Russia
C. L. S. Lewis United Kingdom
G. Charatis United States
F.P. Boody Poland
C. J. Keane United States
C. H. Skinner United States
C. DeMichelis France
C. C. Smith United Kingdom
A. S. Shlyaptseva United States
J. Katzenstein United Kingdom
C. Fleurier relative to K. N. Koshelev Russia K. N. Koshelev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
K. N. Koshelev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Fleurier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Fleurier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Fleurier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Fleurier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Fleurier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Fleurier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Fleurier. The network helps show where C. Fleurier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Fleurier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Fleurier Line = papers co-authored together C. Fleurier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990142
2 1977117
3 198955
4 197448
5 198648
6 198931
7 200031
8 199730
9 199230
10 199529
11 198826
12 200520
13 199918
14 197818
15 198417
16 200217
17 200214
18 197714
19 198013
20 199112

About C. Fleurier

C. Fleurier is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Spectroscopy and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 856 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (33 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (19 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (14 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (8 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (8 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (7 papers) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (276 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (599 citations), Mechanics of Materials (446 citations), Spectroscopy (181 citations) and Radiation (75 citations). C. Fleurier has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Romania. Frequent co-authors include J. Chapelle, D. Gardès, S. Sahal−Bréchot, D. H. H. Hoffmann, K. Weyrich, R. Bimbot, H. D. Wahl, Dunpin Hong, C. Deutsch and G. Maynard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Microelectronic Engineering and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact