C. Fleurier

47 papers receiving 793 citations

Peers

C. Fleurier
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 270
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 588
  • Mechanics of Materials 435
  • Spectroscopy 178
  • Radiation 73
Replace C. L. S. Lewis with:
C. L. S. Lewis United Kingdom
G. Charatis United States
F.P. Boody Poland
C. H. Skinner United States
C. J. Keane United States
A. S. Shlyaptseva United States
J. Katzenstein United Kingdom
C. C. Smith United Kingdom
P. Bogen Germany
Paul D. Rockett United States
C. Fleurier relative to C. L. S. Lewis United Kingdom C. L. S. Lewis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
C. L. S. Lewis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Fleurier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Fleurier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Fleurier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Fleurier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Fleurier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Fleurier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Fleurier. The network helps show where C. Fleurier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Fleurier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Fleurier Line = papers co-authored together C. Fleurier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990141
2 1977116
3 198955
4 198648
5 197446
6 198931
7 199730
8 200030
9 199229
10 199528
11 198822
12 200519
13 199918
14 197817
15 198417
16 200216
17 200213
18 197712
19 199112
20 198012

About C. Fleurier

C. Fleurier is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Spectroscopy and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 49 papers that have together received 834 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (33 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (18 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (14 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (8 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (8 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (7 papers) and Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (270 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (588 citations), Mechanics of Materials (435 citations), Spectroscopy (178 citations) and Radiation (73 citations). C. Fleurier has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Romania. Frequent co-authors include J. Chapelle, D. Gardès, S. Sahal−Bréchot, D. H. H. Hoffmann, R. Bimbot, H. D. Wahl, K. Weyrich, Dunpin Hong, C. Deutsch and G. Maynard. Their work appears in journals such as Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Physical Review A, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Microelectronic Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact