M. Cecconi

2.2k citations
30 papers · 472 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

M. Cecconi

27 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

M. Cecconi
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Instrumentation 42
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 348
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 116
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 232
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 41
Replace T. Eberle with:
T. Eberle Germany
N. Gisin Switzerland
Thiago Guerreiro Brazil
Deny R. Hamel Canada
Alessio Avella Italy
Thomas E. Kiess United States
Henry H. Hogue United States
Bassam Helou United States
Fumihiro Kaneda Japan
Evan Meyer-Scott Canada
M. Cecconi relative to T. Eberle Germany T. Eberle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
T. Eberle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Cecconi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Cecconi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Cecconi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Cecconi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Cecconi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Cecconi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Cecconi. The network helps show where M. Cecconi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Cecconi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Cecconi Line = papers co-authored together M. Cecconi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018220
2 201882
3 201621
4 200321
5 201821
6 201118
7 200918
8 201417
9 202212
10
PAOLO: a Polarimeter Add-On for the LRS Optics at a Nasmyth focus of the TNG?
20165
11 20124
12 20164
13 20124
14 20183
15 20063
16 20023
17 20143
18 20102
19 20022
20 20032

About M. Cecconi

M. Cecconi is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (14 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (13 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (6 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (5 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (5 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers) and Advanced optical system design (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (42 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (348 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (116 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (232 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (41 citations). M. Cecconi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. Ghedina, E. Molinari, F. Wildi, F. Bouchy, Ewelina Obrzud, Steve Lecomte, Stefan Kundermann, M. Rainer, Tobias Herr and F. Pepe. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Optics Express, Physical Review Letters and Nature Photonics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact