Luke Testa
Impact in
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management
- Research and Theory top 10%
Papers in
-
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 7
-
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 7
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey Braithwaite (16 shared papers)Kristiana Ludlow (8 shared papers)Gina Lamprell (5 shared papers)Jessica Herkes (4 shared papers)Robyn Clay‐Williams (7 shared papers)Rebecca Mitchell (8 shared papers)Elise McPherson (3 shared papers)Zhicheng Li (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Luke Testa
29 papers receiving 810 citations
Luke Testa's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Health Information Management 152
- Research and Theory 23
- Emergency Medical Services 158
- Pharmacy 89
- General Health Professions 429
Countries citing papers authored by Luke Testa
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Testa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Testa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Testa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Testa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Testa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Testa. The network helps show where Luke Testa may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luke Testa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Association between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes: systematic review Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 310 |
| 2 | 2016 | 186 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 3 |
About Luke Testa
Luke Testa is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (7 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (3 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (152 citations), Research and Theory (23 citations), Emergency Medical Services (158 citations), Pharmacy (89 citations) and General Health Professions (429 citations). Luke Testa has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Braithwaite, Kristiana Ludlow, Gina Lamprell, Jessica Herkes, Robyn Clay‐Williams, Rebecca Mitchell, Elise McPherson, Zhicheng Li, Yvonne Zurynski and Hanna Augustsson. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, BMC Health Services Research, JMIR Mental Health, International Journal of Mental Health Systems and Frontiers in Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.