Luke Johnston

4.2k citations
40 papers · 3.1k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Luke Johnston

40 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Luke Johnston
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Applied Psychology 1.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 830
  • Clinical Psychology 772
  • Social Psychology 408
  • Sociology and Political Science 450
Replace Bethany M. Wootton with:
Bethany M. Wootton Australia
Roisin M. O’Connor Canada
Margaret Anne Carney United States
Justin F. Hummer United States
Judy Zou Australia
Janine V. Olthuis Canada
Alison M. Yaeger United States
Tamika C. B. Zapolski United States
Kelly S. DeMartini United States
Agnes M. Annus United States
Luke Johnston relative to Bethany M. Wootton Australia Bethany M. Wootton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Bethany M. Wootton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Johnston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Johnston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Johnston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Johnston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Johnston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Johnston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Johnston. The network helps show where Luke Johnston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luke Johnston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke Johnston Line = papers co-authored together Luke Johnston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013308
2 2011223
3 2014164
4 2010152
5 2013144
6 2015140
7 2015139
8 2011122
9 2009116
10 2011110
11 2009101
12 201199
13 201396
14 200994
15 201487
16 201183
17 201676
18 201373
19 200971
20 201470

About Luke Johnston

Luke Johnston is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (34 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (13 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (830 citations), Clinical Psychology (772 citations), Social Psychology (408 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (450 citations). Luke Johnston has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nickolai Titov, Blake F. Dear, Gavin Andrews, Bethany M. Wootton, Jay Spence, Genevieve Schwencke, Judy Zou, Matthew D. Terides, Carolyn N. Lorian and Peter M. McEvoy. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, PLoS ONE, Internet Interventions, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact