Luke Cox
Impact in
-
- Hormonal and reproductive studies
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Doping in Sports 13
- Sex work and related issues 1
-
- Hormonal and reproductive studies 11
- Co-authors
- Timothy Piatkowski (15 shared papers)Luke A. Turnock (6 shared papers)Nick Gibbs (5 shared papers)Letizia Paoli (2 shared papers)Jim McVeigh (2 shared papers)Andrew Bloodworth (6 shared papers)Mike McNamee (5 shared papers)Matthew Dunn (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Harm Reduction Journal (2 papers)International Journal of Drug Policy (2 papers)Performance Enhancement & Health (10 papers)Health Sociology Review (1 paper)Deviant Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaBelgium
In The Last Decade
Luke Cox
24 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 127
- Applied Psychology 22
- Sociology and Political Science 96
- Clinical Psychology 34
- Gender Studies 16
Countries citing papers authored by Luke Cox
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Cox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Cox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Cox. The network helps show where Luke Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Luke Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 6 | |
| 13 | Olympic Doping, Transparency, and the Therapeutic Exemption Process | 1970 | 6 |
| 14 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 2 |
About Luke Cox
Luke Cox is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Doping in Sports (13 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (11 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (127 citations), Applied Psychology (22 citations), Sociology and Political Science (96 citations), Clinical Psychology (34 citations) and Gender Studies (16 citations). Luke Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Piatkowski, Luke A. Turnock, Nick Gibbs, Letizia Paoli, Jim McVeigh, Andrew Bloodworth, Mike McNamee, Matthew Dunn, Sylvie Parent and Tine Vertommen. Their work appears in journals such as Harm Reduction Journal, International Journal of Drug Policy, Performance Enhancement & Health, Health Sociology Review and Deviant Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.