Performance Enhancement & Health

264 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 264 papers published in Performance Enhancement & Health in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Performance Enhancement & Health usually cover Sociology and Political Science (149 papers), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (98 papers) and Applied Psychology (52 papers) specifically the topics of Doping in Sports (136 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (98 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Performance Enhancement & Health are Andrea Petróczi, Matthew Dunn, Wanja Wolff, Louis‐Solal Giboin, Jules Woolf, Chris Englert, Paul Dimeo, Margaret S. Osborne, Marie Claire Van Hout and Katinka van de Ven.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Performance Enhancement & Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Performance Enhancement & Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Performance Enhancement & Health.

Countries where authors publish in Performance Enhancement & Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Performance Enhancement & Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Performance Enhancement & Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Performance Enhancement & Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025