Luke Conibear

1.4k citations
29 papers · 952 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Luke Conibear

29 papers receiving 949 citations

Peers

Luke Conibear
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 557
  • Atmospheric Science 371
  • Global and Planetary Change 422
  • Pollution 183
  • Environmental Engineering 179
Replace Scott Archer‐Nicholls with:
Scott Archer‐Nicholls United Kingdom
Kristofer Lasko United States
N. C. Gupta India
Yaoxian Huang United States
T. Saud India
Magdalena Kistler Austria
Henry Roman United States
Mark Zunckel South Africa
Miroslav Josipovic South Africa
Andrew D. Venter South Africa
Luke Conibear relative to Scott Archer‐Nicholls United Kingdom Scott Archer‐Nicholls's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Scott Archer‐Nicholls · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Conibear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Conibear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Conibear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Conibear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Conibear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Conibear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Conibear. The network helps show where Luke Conibear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luke Conibear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke Conibear Line = papers co-authored together Luke Conibear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018172
2 201983
3 201972
4 201970
5 202168
6 202159
7 202049
8 202043
9 202135
10 201834
11 202130
12 202029
13 202027
14 201823
15 202019
16 202017
17 202217
18 202115
19 201815
20 202214

About Luke Conibear

Luke Conibear is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Pollution and Automotive Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Air Quality and Health Impacts (21 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (14 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (11 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (9 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (4 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (4 papers) and Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (557 citations), Atmospheric Science (371 citations), Global and Planetary Change (422 citations), Pollution (183 citations) and Environmental Engineering (179 citations). Luke Conibear has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dominick V. Spracklen, Christoph Knote, S. R. Arnold, Edward Butt, Carly Reddington, Ben Silver, Laura Kiely, Christine Wiedinmyer, Ying Chen and Oliver Wild. Their work appears in journals such as GeoHealth, Environmental Research Letters, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Nature Communications and Earth s Future.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact