Luis Rosero‐Bixby

138 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Luis Rosero‐Bixby
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Health 311
  • Aging 61
  • Demography 379
  • Gender Studies 245
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
Replace William H. Dow with:
William H. Dow United States
Jacques Véron France
Abdel R. Omran United States
Jacob S. Siegel United States
James C. Riley United States
Michael Stepner United States
Frans van Poppel Netherlands
Benjamin Scuderi United States
Domantas Jasilionis Germany
W. Brass United Kingdom
Luis Rosero‐Bixby relative to William H. Dow United States William H. Dow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
William H. Dow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luis Rosero‐Bixby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Rosero‐Bixby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Rosero‐Bixby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Rosero‐Bixby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luis Rosero‐Bixby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Rosero‐Bixby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Rosero‐Bixby. The network helps show where Luis Rosero‐Bixby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luis Rosero‐Bixby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luis Rosero‐Bixby Line = papers co-authored together Luis Rosero‐Bixby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 151 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003249
2 2009112
3 200979
4 199379
5 199875
6
A case-control study of breast cancer and hormonal contraception in Costa Rica.
198768
7
Oral contraceptives and cervical cancer risk in Costa Rica. Detection bias or causal association?
198860
8 200856
9 201456
10 199555
11 198752
12 200851
13 198946
14 201543
15 201142
16 201642
17 200442
18 199442
19 201341
20 202240

About Luis Rosero‐Bixby

Luis Rosero‐Bixby is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Health and Finance, having authored 151 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (15 papers), Global Health Care Issues (15 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (15 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (14 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (12 papers), Aging, Health, and Disability (11 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (8 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (311 citations), Aging (61 citations), Demography (379 citations), Gender Studies (245 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations). Luis Rosero‐Bixby has collaborated with scholars based in Costa Rica, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include William H. Dow, John B. Casterline, Mark W. Oberle, David H. Rehkopf, Teresa Castro Martín, Alberto Palloni, Nancy C. Lee, Teresa Martín‐García, Carolina Santamaría‐Ulloa and Noreen Goldman. Their work appears in journals such as Demographic Research, Journal of Aging and Health, Social Science & Medicine, Demography and Journal of Biosocial Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact