Luis Rosero‐Bixby

123 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Luis Rosero‐Bixby
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Health 279
  • Aging 54
  • Demography 313
  • Gender Studies 201
  • General Health Professions 374
Replace William H. Dow with:
William H. Dow United States
Jacques Véron France
Abdel R. Omran United States
Michael Stepner United States
Benjamin Scuderi United States
Augustin Bergeron United States
James C. Riley United States
Domantas Jasilionis Germany
W. Brass United Kingdom
Michel Guillot United States
Luis Rosero‐Bixby relative to William H. Dow United States William H. Dow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
William H. Dow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luis Rosero‐Bixby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Rosero‐Bixby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Rosero‐Bixby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Rosero‐Bixby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luis Rosero‐Bixby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Rosero‐Bixby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Rosero‐Bixby. The network helps show where Luis Rosero‐Bixby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luis Rosero‐Bixby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luis Rosero‐Bixby Line = papers co-authored together Luis Rosero‐Bixby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 135 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003236
2 2009106
3 200970
4 199867
5 199364
6
A case-control study of breast cancer and hormonal contraception in Costa Rica.
198761
7
Oral contraceptives and cervical cancer risk in Costa Rica. Detection bias or causal association?
198858
8 200855
9 199552
10 198751
11 201450
12 200847
13 201542
14 198942
15 200440
16 202240
17 201139
18 201639
19 201338
20 198638

About Luis Rosero‐Bixby

Luis Rosero‐Bixby is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Health and Finance, having authored 135 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Care Issues (14 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (13 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (13 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (12 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (10 papers), Aging, Health, and Disability (10 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (8 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (279 citations), Aging (54 citations), Demography (313 citations), Gender Studies (201 citations) and General Health Professions (374 citations). Luis Rosero‐Bixby has collaborated with scholars based in Costa Rica, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include William H. Dow, John B. Casterline, Mark W. Oberle, David H. Rehkopf, Teresa Castro Martín, Alberto Palloni, Nancy C. Lee, Teresa Martín‐García, Carolina Santamaría‐Ulloa and Noreen Goldman. Their work appears in journals such as Demographic Research, Journal of Aging and Health, Demography, Social Science & Medicine and Social Forces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact