Luis Herrera

6 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Luis Herrera
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Forestry 107
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 308
  • Ecological Modeling 45
  • Global and Planetary Change 220
  • Ecology 147
Replace Débora Cristina Rother with:
Débora Cristina Rother Brazil
Tony Vizcarra Bentos Brazil
Elaine R. Hooper United States
Paul P. K. Chai Denmark
Elâine M. S. Ribeiro Brazil
Geraldo Antônio Daher Corrêa Franco Brazil
Mirjam Kuzee Netherlands
Braulio Vílchez‐Alvarado Costa Rica
Laurie Fajardo Venezuela
Julia L. Wakeling South Africa
Luis Herrera relative to Débora Cristina Rother Brazil Débora Cristina Rother's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Débora Cristina Rother · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luis Herrera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Herrera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Herrera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Herrera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luis Herrera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Herrera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Herrera. The network helps show where Luis Herrera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Luis Herrera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luis Herrera Line = papers co-authored together Luis Herrera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 1995299
2 1995114
3 201738
4 201310
5 20142
6
Notes on the second male specimen of the cryptozoic snake Geophis damiani Wilson, McCranie, & Williams, 1998
20101

About Luis Herrera

Luis Herrera is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography (2 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (2 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (2 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (107 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (308 citations), Ecological Modeling (45 citations), Global and Planetary Change (220 citations) and Ecology (147 citations). Luis Herrera has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Honduras. Frequent co-authors include T. Mitchell Aide, Mayra I. Serrano, Jess K. Zimmerman, Larry David Wilson, Josiah H. Townsend, Jonathan B. Cohen, Bart J. Harmsen, Roberto Salom‐Pérez, Rebecca J. Foster and Kathy Zeller. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Applied Ecology, Journal of Herpetology and The Wilson Journal of Ornithology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact