Luc Staner

3.8k citations
96 papers · 2.7k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Luc Staner

93 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Luc Staner
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 690
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Biological Psychiatry 112
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 538
Replace Jean M. Miewald with:
Jean M. Miewald United States
Stefan Cohrs Germany
Naomi L. Rogers Australia
Patricia A. Coble United States
Roseanne Armitage United States
Martin P. Szuba United States
Adam Wichniak Poland
Eric A. Nofzinger United States
Jutta Backhaus Germany
Carolyn C. Hoch United States
Luc Staner relative to Jean M. Miewald United States Jean M. Miewald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jean M. Miewald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luc Staner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luc Staner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luc Staner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luc Staner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luc Staner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luc Staner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luc Staner. The network helps show where Luc Staner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luc Staner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luc Staner Line = papers co-authored together Luc Staner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009361
2 2001180
3 2003168
4 2000141
5 2009103
6 200899
7 200374
8 199574
9 200362
10 200758
11 200555
12 200053
13 200050
14 199750
15 199848
16 199646
17 199744
18 199443
19 200840
20 200738

About Luc Staner

Luc Staner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Clinical Psychology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (47 papers), Sleep and related disorders (44 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (18 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (17 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (690 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Biological Psychiatry (112 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (538 citations). Luc Staner has collaborated with scholars based in France, Belgium and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include Olivier Le Bon, R. Luthringer, Julien Mendlewicz, Isidore Pelc, Paul Linkowski, Guy Hoffmann, M. Dramaix, Nava Zisapel, James R. Murphy and Corinne Staner. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, Psychiatry Research, Sleep Medicine and European Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact