Luc Ria

68 papers receiving 788 citations

Peers

Luc Ria
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Linguistics and Language 168
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 44
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 71
  • Social Psychology 340
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 201
Replace Chantal Amade-Escot with:
Chantal Amade-Escot France
Niels Brouwer Netherlands
Jennifer Charteris Australia
Eila Estola Finland
Deborah L. Schussler United States
Anastasia P. Samaras United States
Beverly S. Faircloth United States
Barbara Larrivee United States
Jennifer A. Vadeboncoeur Canada
Jason K. Ritter United States
Luc Ria relative to Chantal Amade-Escot France Chantal Amade-Escot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Chantal Amade-Escot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luc Ria

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luc Ria's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luc Ria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luc Ria more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luc Ria

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luc Ria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luc Ria. The network helps show where Luc Ria may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Luc Ria, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luc Ria Line = papers co-authored together Luc Ria links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200392
2 200686
3 200470
4 200855
5 201154
6 200348
7 200944
8 200641
9 200335
10 200929
11 200628
12 200425
13 200322
14 201019
15 200319
16 201419
17 201517
18 201516
19 201416
20 200115

About Luc Ria

Luc Ria is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Linguistics and Language, Social Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 73 papers that have together received 955 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education, sociology, and vocational training (60 papers), Educational Practices and Policies (18 papers), French Language Learning Methods (18 papers), Information Technology and Learning (10 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (10 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (10 papers), Educational Tools and Methods (6 papers) and Social Representations and Identity (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (168 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (44 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (71 citations), Social Psychology (340 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (201 citations). Luc Ria has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Marc Durand, Serge Leblanc, Carole Sève, Jacques Saury, Stéfano Bertone, Patrick Rayou, Jacques Theureau, Germain Poizat, Sébastien Chaliès and David Adé. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy, Psychology of sport and exercise, Vocations and Learning and Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact