Luc Côté

1.6k citations
61 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Luc Côté

55 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Luc Côté
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Family Practice 133
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 32
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 426
  • General Health Professions 375
  • General Psychology 11
Replace Peter Cantillon with:
Peter Cantillon Ireland
John Patrick T. Co United States
V R Neufeld Canada
Andy Wearn New Zealand
Elizabeth Unni United States
Jan Illing United Kingdom
David Blackmore Canada
Ruth Sladek Australia
Jan‐Joost Rethans Netherlands
Juliet Draper United Kingdom
Luc Côté relative to Peter Cantillon Ireland Peter Cantillon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Peter Cantillon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luc Côté

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luc Côté's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luc Côté with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luc Côté more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luc Côté

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luc Côté. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luc Côté. The network helps show where Luc Côté may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luc Côté, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luc Côté Line = papers co-authored together Luc Côté links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005218
2 2000107
3 2001105
4
Supporting patients facing difficult health care decisions: use of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework.
200693
5 200669
6 201066
7 201546
8 201236
9 201435
10 200230
11 200130
12 201128
13 201227
14 200725
15 201224
16 200724
17 201822
18 201714
19 202014
20 202112

About Luc Côté

Luc Côté is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Family Practice, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (29 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (11 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (133 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (32 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (426 citations), General Health Professions (375 citations) and General Psychology (11 citations). Luc Côté has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Zambia. Frequent co-authors include Jean Turgeon, A. Keith W. Brownell, France Légaré, Danielle Saucier, Georges Bordage, Michel Cauchon, Ian D. Graham, Annette M. O’Connor, Jimmie Leppink and Michel Labrecque. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Medical Education, Patient Education and Counseling and Teaching and Learning in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact