Lorène Aeschbach

621 citations
17 papers · 513 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Lorène Aeschbach

17 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

Lorène Aeschbach
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Physiology 183
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 112
  • Cell Biology 82
  • Molecular Biology 287
  • Aging 7
Replace Hedieh Barkhordarian with:
Hedieh Barkhordarian United States
Xiaohai Gong China
Gabriele Basset Germany
Katja Fechteler Germany
Taylor Arhar United States
Takashi Sakoh Japan
Leen Bammens Belgium
Dana O. Wirak United States
Lenzie K. Ford United States
Masanori Tomioka Japan
Lorène Aeschbach relative to Hedieh Barkhordarian United States Hedieh Barkhordarian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hedieh Barkhordarian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lorène Aeschbach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lorène Aeschbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorène Aeschbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorène Aeschbach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lorène Aeschbach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorène Aeschbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorène Aeschbach. The network helps show where Lorène Aeschbach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lorène Aeschbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lorène Aeschbach Line = papers co-authored together Lorène Aeschbach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200897
2 200686
3 201268
4 201667
5 200553
6 200741
7 201328
8 201912
9 202211
10 201710
11 202210
12 202210
13 20129
14 20124
15 20213
16 20243
17 20171

About Lorène Aeschbach

Lorène Aeschbach is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Neurology and Pharmacology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (7 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (5 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (183 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (112 citations), Cell Biology (82 citations), Molecular Biology (287 citations) and Aging (7 citations). Lorène Aeschbach has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patrick C. Fraering, Vincent Dion, Matthias Cacquevel, Bin Yang, Dongyang Li, Pamela Osenkowski, Michael S. Wolfe, Huilin Li, Wenjuan Ye and Dennis J. Selkoe. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Biochemistry, NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics, Journal of Parkinson s Disease and Neurobiology of Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact