Lone Grøn

22 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Lone Grøn
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
  • Pharmacy 37
  • General Health Professions 68
  • Philosophy 32
  • Anthropology 21
Replace Claire Sloan with:
Claire Sloan United Kingdom
Kelly Underman United States
António Barbosa da Silva Sweden
Marja Saarenheimo Finland
Lawrence Dyche United States
Pearl Katz United States
Carolyn S. Wilken United States
Alisa L. Carse United States
Richard W. Momeyer United States
Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche Canada
Lone Grøn relative to Claire Sloan United Kingdom Claire Sloan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Claire Sloan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lone Grøn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lone Grøn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lone Grøn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lone Grøn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lone Grøn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lone Grøn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lone Grøn. The network helps show where Lone Grøn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Lone Grøn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lone Grøn Line = papers co-authored together Lone Grøn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201178
2 201624
3 201321
4 202114
5 201713
6 201913
7 201712
8 201211
9 201711
10
200810
11 20178
12 20226
13 20216
14 20175
15
Imagistic care growing old in a precarious world
20224
16 20133
17 20223
18 20193
19 20242
20 20192

About Lone Grøn

Lone Grøn is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Philosophy, Pharmacy, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (2 papers) and Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations), Pharmacy (37 citations), General Health Professions (68 citations), Philosophy (32 citations) and Anthropology (21 citations). Lone Grøn has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lotte Meinert, Cheryl Mattingly, Kirsten Kaya Roessler, Pernille Andreassen, Mette Bech Risør, Susanne Reventlow, Bjarke Oxlund and Janne Brammer Damsgaard. Their work appears in journals such as Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, Ethnos, Ethos, Qualitative Health Research and Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact