Mette Bech Risør

64 papers receiving 879 citations

Peers

Mette Bech Risør
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Applied Psychology 172
  • Family Practice 39
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 245
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 19
  • Philosophy 129
Replace Linda J. Baumann with:
Linda J. Baumann United States
Andrea McCloughen Australia
Susan Brownlee United States
E.A.G. Joosten Netherlands
G.H. de Weert-van Oene Netherlands
C.M.T. Gijsbers van Wijk Netherlands
L. DeFuentes-Merillas Netherlands
Annette Sofie Davidsen Denmark
Erin M. Bergner United States
Lise Hounsgaard Denmark
Mette Bech Risør relative to Linda J. Baumann United States Linda J. Baumann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31.7×
Linda J. Baumann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mette Bech Risør

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mette Bech Risør's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mette Bech Risør with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mette Bech Risør more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mette Bech Risør

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mette Bech Risør. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mette Bech Risør. The network helps show where Mette Bech Risør may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mette Bech Risør, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mette Bech Risør Line = papers co-authored together Mette Bech Risør links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201398
2 201675
3 201348
4 201748
5 200942
6 201441
7 201441
8 201438
9 201432
10 201328
11 201725
12 201321
13 201620
14 201719
15 201618
16 201516
17 201616
18 201916
19 201615
20 201514

About Mette Bech Risør

Mette Bech Risør is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 70 papers that have together received 905 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (14 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (14 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (9 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (7 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (172 citations), Family Practice (39 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (245 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (19 citations) and Philosophy (129 citations). Mette Bech Risør has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include May‐Lill Johansen, Rikke Sand Andersen, Martin Eisemann, Knut Waterloo, Ragnhild Sørensen Høifødt, Maja Wilhelmsen, Nils Kolstrup, Kjersti Lillevoll, Hasse Melbye and Ole Rikard Haavet. Their work appears in journals such as Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine, Anthropology and Medicine, BMC Family Practice, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care and Anthropology in Action.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact