L.K. Earl

30 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

L.K. Earl
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Small Animals 332
  • Dermatology 86
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 137
  • Chemical Health and Safety 6
  • Pharmaceutical Science 53
Replace Jalila Hibatallah with:
Jalila Hibatallah France
Magalie Tailhardat France
Valérie Zuang Italy
Irene Manou Germany
O. de Silva France
José Cotovio France
Christiane Wiemann Germany
Richard Cubberley United Kingdom
Anna Lowit United States
Gladys Ouédraogo France
L.K. Earl relative to Jalila Hibatallah France Jalila Hibatallah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Jalila Hibatallah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L.K. Earl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.K. Earl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.K. Earl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.K. Earl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.K. Earl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.K. Earl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.K. Earl. The network helps show where L.K. Earl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L.K. Earl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L.K. Earl Line = papers co-authored together L.K. Earl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998155
2 200977
3 199860
4 200154
5 200235
6 199828
7 200324
8 199824
9 199724
10 200222
11 199320
12 199617
13 200116
14 199715
15 200110
16
Eye Irritation Testing: The Way Forward. The Report and Recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 34.
201410
17
Interindividual variability in the percutaneous penetration of testosterone through human skin in vitro
20018
18 19957
19 19916
20 20066

About L.K. Earl

L.K. Earl is a scholar working on Small Animals, Dermatology, Immunology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (14 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (6 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (4 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (332 citations), Dermatology (86 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (137 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (6 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (53 citations). L.K. Earl has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Julia H. Fentem, Philip A. Botham, PW Jones, Rodger D. Curren, Michael Balls, David J. Esdaile, Manfred Liebsch, Hermann−Georg Holzhütter, John W. Harbell and Karen J. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology in Vitro, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Toxicology and Human & Experimental Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact