Li‐Ting Chien
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Ion Channels and Receptors
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 5
- Ion channel regulation and function 4
- Connexins and lens biology 3
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 3
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 2
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 2
- Co-authors
- H. Criss Hartzell (7 shared papers)Zhiqiang Qu (4 shared papers)Kuai Yu (2 shared papers)Qinghuan Xiao (1 shared paper)Yuanyuan Cui (2 shared papers)Zhiren Zhang (1 shared paper)Hsiung–Fei Chien (1 shared paper)Chin‐Tin Chen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of General Physiology (3 papers)Molecular Cancer (1 paper)Physiology (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Li‐Ting Chien
9 papers receiving 798 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Sensory Systems 90
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 314
- Ophthalmology 112
- Molecular Biology 663
- Cell Biology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Ting Chien
This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Ting Chien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Ting Chien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Ting Chien more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Ting Chien
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Ting Chien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Ting Chien. The network helps show where Li‐Ting Chien may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Li‐Ting Chien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 267 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 201 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 77 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 51 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 10 |
About Li‐Ting Chien
Li‐Ting Chien is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Ophthalmology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 806 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Connexins and lens biology (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (90 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (314 citations), Ophthalmology (112 citations), Molecular Biology (663 citations) and Cell Biology (89 citations). Li‐Ting Chien has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include H. Criss Hartzell, Zhiqiang Qu, Kuai Yu, Qinghuan Xiao, Yuanyuan Cui, Zhiren Zhang, Hsiung–Fei Chien, Chin‐Tin Chen, Criss Hartzell and Ilva Putzier. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of General Physiology, Molecular Cancer, Physiology, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.