Physiological Reviews

2.1k papers and 754.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Physiological Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 754.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Physiological Reviews usually cover Molecular Biology (816 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (343 papers) and Physiology (303 papers) specifically the topics of Ion channel regulation and function (158 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (143 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (101 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physiological Reviews are Wulf Dröge, Dennis J. Selkoe, S.E. Wendelaar Bonga, Simon C. Gandevia, Bruce S. McEwen, Karl‐Heinz Krause, Karen Bedard, R. Alan North, Peter Lipton and Jens J. Holst.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physiological Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physiological Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physiological Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Physiological Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physiological Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physiological Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physiological Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025