Lisbeth Klastrup

744 citations
30 papers · 483 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Lisbeth Klastrup

26 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Lisbeth Klastrup
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Museology 61
  • Communication 100
  • Literature and Literary Theory 92
  • Human-Computer Interaction 40
  • Gender Studies 63
Replace Kim Barbour with:
Kim Barbour Australia
Anastasia Salter United States
María-José Masanet Spain
Shira Chess United States
Helen Thornham United Kingdom
Sandra Hughes‐Hassell United States
Amparo Lasén Spain
Eliza T. Dresang United States
Torill Elvira Mortensen Denmark
Patrick Jagoda United States
Lisbeth Klastrup relative to Kim Barbour Australia Kim Barbour's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Kim Barbour · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Klastrup

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Klastrup's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Klastrup with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Klastrup more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Klastrup

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Klastrup. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Klastrup. The network helps show where Lisbeth Klastrup may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth Klastrup, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisbeth Klastrup Line = papers co-authored together Lisbeth Klastrup links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004126
2 201469
3 201940
4 201431
5
The Worldness of EverQuest: Exploring a 21st Century Fiction.
200930
6
Game of Thrones: Transmedial Worlds, Fandom, and Social Gaming
201427
7 202021
8 200920
9 200619
10 201816
11 201916
12 201813
13 20178
14
Transmedial Worlds in Everyday Life: Networked Reception, Social Media, and Fictional Worlds
20198
15 20167
16 20037
17 20216
18 20026
19 20094
20 20183

About Lisbeth Klastrup

Lisbeth Klastrup is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Clinical Psychology, Education and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 30 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (17 papers), Media Studies and Communication (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (2 papers), Social and Educational Sciences (2 papers) and Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (61 citations), Communication (100 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (92 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (40 citations) and Gender Studies (63 citations). Lisbeth Klastrup has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Susana Tosca, Carsten Stage, Matthew Allen, Hannah J. Gould, Jakob Linaa Jensen and Jens Hoff. Their work appears in journals such as Social Media + Society, MedieKultur Journal of media and communication research, First Monday, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia and Teksty Drugie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact