Lisbeth Drury

19 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers

Lisbeth Drury
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 318
  • Demography 210
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 13
  • Health 100
  • Applied Psychology 39
Replace Peggy Voß with:
Peggy Voß Germany
Tracey L. Gendron United States
Jan Baars Netherlands
Nicky J. Newton United States
Anthony R. Bardo United States
Patricia E. Gettings United States
Susan M. Boland United States
Antonio Bustillos Spain
Margaret Morganroth Gullette United States
Chris Wellin United States
Lisbeth Drury relative to Peggy Voß Germany Peggy Voß's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Peggy Voß · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Drury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Drury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Drury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Drury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Drury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Drury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Drury. The network helps show where Lisbeth Drury may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth Drury, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisbeth Drury Line = papers co-authored together Lisbeth Drury links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017189
2 2016115
3 2016105
4 201630
5 202222
6 201622
7 202116
8 202410
9 201910
10 20219
11 20207
12 20186
13 20246
14
Making intergenerational connections – an evidence review
20175
15 20224
16 20174
17 20204
18
The perception of ageing and age discrimination
20164
19 20221
20 20250

About Lisbeth Drury

Lisbeth Drury is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Demography, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 569 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (2 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (318 citations), Demography (210 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (13 citations), Health (100 citations) and Applied Psychology (39 citations). Lisbeth Drury has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include William Dominic Joshua Abrams, Hannah J. Swift, Ruth A. Lamont, Paul Hutchison, Giovanni Antonio Travaglino, Ulrike Fasbender, Lindsey Cameron, Eva Derous, Michèle D. Birtel and Richard John Crisp. Their work appears in journals such as Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Journal of Social Issues, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, Work Aging and Retirement and Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact