Ling Leng

67 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Ling Leng's Hit Papers

Outcome over seven years of healthy adults with and without subjective cognitive impairment 2010 · 443 citations
4430+5+10Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Ling Leng
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 303
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 142
  • Rehabilitation 52
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
Replace Bernet Kato with:
Bernet Kato United Kingdom
Maura Pugliatti Italy
Masoud Etemadifar Iran
Jamie N. Justice United States
Joris Deelen Netherlands
Gregory Hannum United States
Emma Nichols United States
Angela Di Baldassarre Italy
Nobuyoshi Hirose Japan
Emanuele D’Amico Italy
Ling Leng relative to Bernet Kato United Kingdom Bernet Kato's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bernet Kato · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling Leng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling Leng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling Leng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling Leng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling Leng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling Leng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling Leng. The network helps show where Ling Leng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling Leng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling Leng Line = papers co-authored together Ling Leng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Outcome over seven years of healthy adults with and without subjective cognitive impairment
Hit paper breakdown →
2010443
2 2020115
3 202289
4 201568
5 201255
6 202145
7 202245
8 201338
9 200832
10 201532
11 202231
12 201429
13 202328
14 202326
15 202026
16 202025
17 201425
18 201823
19 202122
20 202022

About Ling Leng

Ling Leng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Physiology, Cell Biology and Immunology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (5 papers), Hair Growth and Disorders (4 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (4 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (4 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (4 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (3 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (303 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (142 citations), Rehabilitation (52 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (14 citations). Ling Leng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Melanie Shulman, ‌Barry Reisberg, Carol Torossian, Wei Zhu, Yunping Zhu, Naijun Tang, Jie Ma, Fuchu He, Mansheng Li and Dunqin Gao. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Science, Stem Cell Research & Therapy, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact