Ling Gu

774 citations
41 papers · 582 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ling Gu

38 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Ling Gu
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 166
  • Microbiology 54
  • Biophysics 33
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 69
  • Physiology 79
Replace Marcus Niebert with:
Marcus Niebert Germany
SoonGweon Hong United States
Samuel Sánchez Spain
Jinho Yoon South Korea
Fumimasa Nomura Japan
Yanxia Hou France
Huizhuo Pan China
Yifan Xia United States
Casper Hyttel Clausen Denmark
Junho Chung South Korea
Ling Gu relative to Marcus Niebert Germany Marcus Niebert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marcus Niebert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling Gu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling Gu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling Gu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling Gu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling Gu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling Gu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling Gu. The network helps show where Ling Gu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling Gu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling Gu Line = papers co-authored together Ling Gu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201584
2 200981
3 201273
4 201755
5 201634
6 201127
7 201424
8 201423
9 201423
10 201220
11 201419
12 201415
13 201413
14 201210
15 20149
16 20139
17 20157
18 20147
19 20136
20 20115

About Ling Gu

Ling Gu is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Biophysics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (14 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (3 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers) and Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (166 citations), Microbiology (54 citations), Biophysics (33 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (69 citations) and Physiology (79 citations). Ling Gu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Samarendra Mohanty, Wandy L. Beatty, Regina K. Rowe, Hung Cao, J.‐C. Chiao, Dan Qiu, Zhi‐Guo Gu, Zaijun Li, Perry N. Fuchs and Sanjay Anand. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Biomedical Optics, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, RSC Advances and Biophysical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact