Li‐Ling Liao

607 citations
40 papers · 408 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Li‐Ling Liao

33 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Li‐Ling Liao
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Health Informatics 27
  • General Health Professions 123
  • Speech and Hearing 23
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 72
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2
Replace Lynn McBain with:
Lynn McBain New Zealand
Nancy Morioka-Douglas United States
Megan Douglas United States
Michael R. Schmitt United States
Jennifer Rayner Canada
Iiris Hörhammer Finland
Crystal McPhee Australia
Kristin Bell United States
Ella August United States
Benjamin Marent United Kingdom
Li‐Ling Liao relative to Lynn McBain New Zealand Lynn McBain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Lynn McBain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Ling Liao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Ling Liao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Ling Liao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Ling Liao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Ling Liao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Ling Liao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Ling Liao. The network helps show where Li‐Ling Liao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li‐Ling Liao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li‐Ling Liao Line = papers co-authored together Li‐Ling Liao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201679
2 201944
3 202137
4 201729
5 201722
6 202020
7 201916
8 202415
9 202414
10 202113
11 201813
12 201713
13 201911
14 20239
15 20127
16 20247
17 20247
18 20186
19 20156
20 20236

About Li‐Ling Liao

Li‐Ling Liao is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science, Health Informatics and Speech and Hearing, having authored 40 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (27 citations), General Health Professions (123 citations), Speech and Hearing (23 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (72 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (2 citations). Li‐Ling Liao has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Li‐Chun Chang, Chia‐Kuei Lee, Shu‐Fang Shih, Richard H. Osborne, Chieh-Hsing Liu, Hui‐Ling Lin, Chi‐Chin Sun, Yani Wang, Jong‐Long Guo and Yu‐Che Chang. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of School Nursing, International Nursing Review, Nurse Education Today, Nutrients and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact