Fong‐Ching Chang

45 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Fong‐Ching Chang
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Social Psychology 400
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 34
  • Communication 122
  • Education 505
  • Applied Psychology 62
Replace Nicola J. Gray with:
Nicola J. Gray United Kingdom
Alan Branthwaite United Kingdom
Rebecca Barnes United Kingdom
Kathleen Kelly United States
Bryan Burford United Kingdom
Jane Barnett United Kingdom
Shirlynn Spacapan United States
Anne-Linda Camerini Switzerland
Ariadna Angulo-Brunet Spain
Nae‐Fang Miao Taiwan
Fong‐Ching Chang relative to Nicola J. Gray United Kingdom Nicola J. Gray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
Nicola J. Gray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fong‐Ching Chang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fong‐Ching Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fong‐Ching Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fong‐Ching Chang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fong‐Ching Chang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fong‐Ching Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fong‐Ching Chang. The network helps show where Fong‐Ching Chang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fong‐Ching Chang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fong‐Ching Chang Line = papers co-authored together Fong‐Ching Chang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014264
2 2013185
3 2018137
4 201496
5 201795
6 201470
7 201568
8 201464
9 200662
10 201354
11 201450
12 201637
13 201932
14 201327
15 201827
16 201824
17 200924
18 201018
19 201915
20 201415

About Fong‐Ching Chang

Fong‐Ching Chang is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Physiology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (12 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (10 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (8 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (3 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (400 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (34 citations), Communication (122 citations), Education (505 citations) and Applied Psychology (62 citations). Fong‐Ching Chang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Chiung‐Hui Chiu, Ching‐Mei Lee, Nae‐Fang Miao, Ping‐Hung Chen, Jeng‐Tung Chiang, Ying-Chun Pan, Hung‐Yi Chuang, Shumei Liu, Ming‐Kung Yeh and Sheng‐Der Hsu. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Health Education Research and Journal of Pediatric Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact