Li‐Ling Hsu

60 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Li‐Ling Hsu
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Research and Theory 112
  • Leadership and Management 69
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 31
  • Management Information Systems 175
  • Family Practice 22
Replace Diane L. Huber with:
Diane L. Huber United States
Barbara J. Daley United States
Diane J. Skiba United States
Paula M. Roberts United Kingdom
A.J. Kleinheksel United States
Jasperina Brouwer Netherlands
Andrew Gonczi Australia
André Büssing Germany
Christine A. Dearnley United Kingdom
Lorraine Carter Canada
Li‐Ling Hsu relative to Diane L. Huber United States Diane L. Huber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
Diane L. Huber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Ling Hsu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Ling Hsu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Ling Hsu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Ling Hsu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Ling Hsu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Ling Hsu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Ling Hsu. The network helps show where Li‐Ling Hsu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li‐Ling Hsu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li‐Ling Hsu Line = papers co-authored together Li‐Ling Hsu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014120
2 201194
3 200490
4 201490
5 200480
6 200577
7 201270
8 201356
9 200554
10 201145
11 200944
12 201442
13 201338
14 201936
15 200136
16 201436
17 200635
18 201535
19 200732
20 200530

About Li‐Ling Hsu

Li‐Ling Hsu is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Information Systems and Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (112 citations), Leadership and Management (69 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (31 citations), Management Information Systems (175 citations) and Family Practice (22 citations). Li‐Ling Hsu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Suh‐Ing Hsieh, Minder Chen, Yalin Chen, Li-Fen Chao, Jun‐Yu Fan, Sui‐Whi Jane, Tzu‐Hsin Huang, Mei‐Ying Chang, Jason C.H. Chen and Tzu‐Chuan Chou. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Contemporary Nurse, Journal of Nursing Research, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Industrial Management & Data Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact