Li-Jung Chen

35 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Li-Jung Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Health 145
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 24
  • Physiology 403
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 155
  • Applied Psychology 49
Replace Olivia Remes with:
Olivia Remes United Kingdom
Courtney J. Stevens United States
Dorota Szczęśniak Poland
María J. Marquine United States
Kyle J. Bourassa United States
Meg Fluharty United Kingdom
Annie Robitaille Canada
Steven D. Shirk United States
Junhong Yu Singapore
Jonathan Jackson United States
Li-Jung Chen relative to Olivia Remes United Kingdom Olivia Remes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Olivia Remes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li-Jung Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li-Jung Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li-Jung Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li-Jung Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li-Jung Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li-Jung Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li-Jung Chen. The network helps show where Li-Jung Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li-Jung Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li-Jung Chen Line = papers co-authored together Li-Jung Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018172
2 2017105
3 201293
4 201583
5 201282
6 201870
7 201768
8 201660
9 200952
10 201746
11 201543
12 201639
13 201739
14 201638
15 201237
16 201232
17 201625
18 201921
19 201121
20 201517

About Li-Jung Chen

Li-Jung Chen is a scholar working on Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (12 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (145 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (24 citations), Physiology (403 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (155 citations) and Applied Psychology (49 citations). Li-Jung Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Po‐Wen Ku, Kenneth R Fox, Andrew Steptoe, Yung Liao, Brendon Stubbs, Ming‐Chun Hsueh, Clare Stevinson, Pesus Chou, Kaijun Niu and Bin Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Gerontology, Quality of Life Research, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Age and Ageing and Social Indicators Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact