Lies Notebaert

2.1k citations
79 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Lies Notebaert

71 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Lies Notebaert
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 890
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 768
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 98
  • Applied Psychology 129
  • Clinical Psychology 452
Replace Patrick Clarke with:
Patrick Clarke Australia
Carmen Morawetz Germany
Richard B. Lopez United States
Katherine Vytal United States
Álvaro Sánchez-López Spain
Carly K. Peterson United States
Bryan T. Denny United States
Thomas G. Adams United States
Noga Cohen Israel
Mark J. Boschen Australia
Lies Notebaert relative to Patrick Clarke Australia Patrick Clarke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Patrick Clarke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lies Notebaert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lies Notebaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lies Notebaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lies Notebaert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lies Notebaert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lies Notebaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lies Notebaert. The network helps show where Lies Notebaert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lies Notebaert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lies Notebaert Line = papers co-authored together Lies Notebaert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014150
2 2014139
3 2019104
4 201791
5 201186
6 200860
7 200956
8 201141
9 201639
10 201438
11 202038
12 202031
13 201731
14 201727
15 201226
16 201823
17 201021
18 201821
19 202121
20 201320

About Lies Notebaert

Lies Notebaert is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (47 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (19 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (15 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers), Sleep and related disorders (8 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (8 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (890 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (768 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (98 citations), Applied Psychology (129 citations) and Clinical Psychology (452 citations). Lies Notebaert has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Colin MacLeod, Patrick Clarke, Ben Grafton, Geert Crombez, Stefaan Van Damme, Jan Theeuwes, Michael Browning, Jan De Houwer, Geoff Hammond and Robert J. Hartsuiker. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Cognitive Therapy and Research, Personality and Individual Differences and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact