lien Peters

21 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

lien Peters
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Statistics and Probability 371
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 64
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 152
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 86
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 21
Replace Jan Lonnemann with:
Jan Lonnemann Germany
Silvia Pixner Austria
Jennifer E. Minas United States
Céline Lanoë France
Shelley Shaul Israel
Dazhi Cheng China
Ruth Schumann-Hengsteler Germany
Abby G. Carlson United States
Bianca M.C.W. van Bers Netherlands
Laurence Rousselle Belgium
lien Peters relative to Jan Lonnemann Germany Jan Lonnemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Jan Lonnemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by lien Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of lien Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by lien Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites lien Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by lien Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by lien Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by lien Peters. The network helps show where lien Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside lien Peters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with lien Peters Line = papers co-authored together lien Peters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017183
2 2019109
3 201862
4 202049
5 201747
6 201728
7 201626
8 202122
9 201516
10 202116
11 201913
12 202113
13 202310
14 20149
15 20209
16 20239
17 20228
18 20003
19 20223
20 20253

About lien Peters

lien Peters is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Law, having authored 25 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (14 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (2 papers), Franchising Strategies and Performance (2 papers), Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology (2 papers), European and International Contract Law (2 papers), Communication and COVID-19 Impact (1 paper) and Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (371 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (64 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (152 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (21 citations) lien Peters has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bert De Smedt, Daniel Ansari, Hans Op de Beeck, Jessica Bulthé, Nicky Daniëls, Maaike Vandermosten, Pol Ghesquière, Marc F. Joanisse, Eva Ceulemans and Kiran Vanbinst. Their work appears in journals such as Human Brain Mapping, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, ZDM and Consciousness and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact