Li‐Chen Ou

918 citations
34 papers · 648 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Li‐Chen Ou

30 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers

Li‐Chen Ou
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Social Psychology 510
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 244
  • Sensory Systems 88
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 244
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 109
Replace Angela Wright with:
Angela Wright United Kingdom
Li‐Chen Ou United Kingdom
Shing‐Sheng Guan Taiwan
Aran Hansuebsai Thailand
Jonathan Sammartino United States
Pei‐Li Sun Taiwan
Atsushi Kimura Japan
Tomohiro Masuda Japan
Miho Saito Japan
Faber Birren United States
Li‐Chen Ou relative to Angela Wright United Kingdom Angela Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Angela Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Chen Ou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Chen Ou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Chen Ou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Chen Ou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Chen Ou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Chen Ou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Chen Ou. The network helps show where Li‐Chen Ou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Li‐Chen Ou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li‐Chen Ou Line = papers co-authored together Li‐Chen Ou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004172
2 201181
3 201152
4 201851
5 200049
6 201039
7 201829
8
Package Design: Colour Harmony and Consumer Expectations
201426
9 201420
10 201619
11 201316
12 201815
13 201614
14 201713
15 20159
16 20106
17 20125
18 20214
19 20214
20 20154

About Li‐Chen Ou

Li‐Chen Ou is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Food Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color perception and design (29 papers), Color Science and Applications (16 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (8 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (5 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers) and Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (510 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (244 citations), Sensory Systems (88 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (244 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (109 citations). Li‐Chen Ou has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Ming Ronnier Luo, Angela Wright, Andrée Woodcock, Ming Ronnier Luo, J. B. Hutchings, Ming‐Chuen Chuang, Minchen Wei, Pei‐Li Sun, Rafael Huertas and Ronnier Luo. Their work appears in journals such as Color Research & Application, Food Quality and Preference, Applied Sciences, Optics Express and Displays.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact