Libor Staněk

3.6k citations
9 papers · 63 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Libor Staněk

7 papers receiving 63 citations

Peers

Libor Staněk
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 28
  • Reproductive Medicine 22
  • Gastroenterology 3
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 17
  • Oncology 13
Replace Roya Faraji Darkhaneh with:
Roya Faraji Darkhaneh Iran
Dimitrios Zouzoulas Greece
Jaime Siegrist Spain
Andrea L. Buras United States
Elizabeth Poyner United States
Coriolan Lebreton France
María Urbanowicz Spain
Romerai D’Amico Italy
Esther van der Heijden Netherlands
Ilka Kolodziej Australia
Libor Staněk relative to Roya Faraji Darkhaneh Iran Roya Faraji Darkhaneh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Roya Faraji Darkhaneh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Libor Staněk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Libor Staněk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Libor Staněk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Libor Staněk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Libor Staněk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Libor Staněk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Libor Staněk. The network helps show where Libor Staněk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Libor Staněk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Libor Staněk Line = papers co-authored together Libor Staněk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201534
2 201410
3 201210
4 20213
5 20173
6
[Polymerase chain reaction: basic principles and applications in molecular pathology].
20132
7 20161
8 20250
9 20200

About Libor Staněk

Libor Staněk is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 63 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (1 paper), Neonatal and Maternal Infections (1 paper), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (1 paper), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (1 paper), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (1 paper) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (28 citations), Reproductive Medicine (22 citations), Gastroenterology (3 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (17 citations) and Oncology (13 citations). Libor Staněk has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pavel Dundr, Ján Laco, W. Glenn McCluggage, Kristýna Němejcová, Petr Škapa, Petra Kleiblová, Sarah Kenny, Michal Zikán, Luboš Petruželka and Adéla Berková. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Molecular Medicine Reports, Medical Science Monitor and Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact