Libor Ebringer

92 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Libor Ebringer
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Food Science 394
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 253
  • Molecular Biology 829
  • Toxicology 40
  • Clinical Biochemistry 57
Replace Bertold R. Fridlender with:
Bertold R. Fridlender Israel
Katsuhiko Matsui Japan
Juraj Krajčovič Slovakia
N. G. Coldham United Kingdom
Ilia Brondz Norway
Georges Michel France
Bronwyn G. Hughes United States
Yoke Kqueen Cheah Malaysia
Yoshimitsu Masuda Japan
Zonghui Yuan China
Libor Ebringer relative to Bertold R. Fridlender Israel Bertold R. Fridlender's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Bertold R. Fridlender · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Libor Ebringer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Libor Ebringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Libor Ebringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Libor Ebringer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Libor Ebringer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Libor Ebringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Libor Ebringer. The network helps show where Libor Ebringer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Libor Ebringer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Libor Ebringer Line = papers co-authored together Libor Ebringer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008182
2 2003143
3 197261
4 200655
5 199541
6 198936
7 200535
8 200834
9 200533
10 199628
11
Prevention of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients by probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium M-74. Pilot study phase I.
200528
12 200727
13 199827
14 197025
15 196224
16 197823
17 196122
18 199022
19 199922
20 197622

About Libor Ebringer

Libor Ebringer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (24 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (10 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (9 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (9 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (7 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (6 papers), Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (5 papers) and Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (394 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (253 citations), Molecular Biology (829 citations), Toxicology (40 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (57 citations). Libor Ebringer has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Ukraine and United States. Frequent co-authors include M Ferencĭk, Juraj Krajčovič, L. Križková, Anna Belicová, John L. Mego, Roman Dušinský, Martin Sojka, Eva Jahnova, Pavel Němec and Ivan Ciznar. Their work appears in journals such as World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Die Naturwissenschaften, Folia Microbiologica, Archives of Microbiology and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact