Liam Patrick Maher

18 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Liam Patrick Maher
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 399
  • Public Administration 27
  • Gender Studies 69
  • Social Psychology 145
  • Applied Psychology 31
Replace Anjali Chaudhry with:
Anjali Chaudhry United States
Jacob W. Breland United States
Wim van Breukelen Netherlands
Nathanael S. Campbell United States
Yongqing Fang Singapore
Thomas C. Cross United States
Liping Gao China
Anna‐Katherine Ward United States
Tyler Burch United States
Melissa Chamberlin United States
Liam Patrick Maher relative to Anjali Chaudhry United States Anjali Chaudhry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Anjali Chaudhry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liam Patrick Maher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Patrick Maher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Patrick Maher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Patrick Maher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Patrick Maher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Patrick Maher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Patrick Maher. The network helps show where Liam Patrick Maher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam Patrick Maher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liam Patrick Maher Line = papers co-authored together Liam Patrick Maher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2019130
2 2020119
3 201786
4 201864
5 201849
6 201628
7 201620
8 202120
9 201718
10 202115
11 201613
12 201913
13 20245
14 20235
15 20224
16 20173
17 20222
18 20202
19 20250
20 20200

About Liam Patrick Maher

Liam Patrick Maher is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Public Administration, having authored 20 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (399 citations), Public Administration (27 citations), Gender Studies (69 citations), Social Psychology (145 citations) and Applied Psychology (31 citations). Liam Patrick Maher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gerald R. Ferris, Charn Patrick McAllister, John N. Harris, B. Parker Ellen, Wayne A. Hochwarter, Zachary A. Russell, Samantha L. Jordan, Christopher C. Rosen, Jeremy D. Mackey and Gang Alan Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Career Development International, Journal of Management, Applied Psychology and International Business Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact