Liam Cross

835 citations
41 papers · 547 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Liam Cross

36 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers

Liam Cross
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 350
  • Social Psychology 209
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 96
  • Clinical Psychology 136
  • Developmental Biology 14
Replace Gray Atherton with:
Gray Atherton United Kingdom
Bahar Tunçgenç United Kingdom
Jennifer Barnes United States
Loes Janssen Netherlands
Francesca Bellagamba Italy
Meia Chita-Tegmark United States
Wen Xiao China
Norbert Zmyj Germany
Christina Bergmann Netherlands
Rebecca A. Williamson United States
Liam Cross relative to Gray Atherton United Kingdom Gray Atherton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Gray Atherton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liam Cross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Cross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Cross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Cross. The network helps show where Liam Cross may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam Cross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liam Cross Line = papers co-authored together Liam Cross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201962
2 201852
3 202149
4 201637
5 201833
6 201927
7 202124
8 202323
9 201922
10 201921
11 202317
12 201917
13 202015
14 201714
15 201913
16 202113
17 202212
18 201910
19 202110
20 20239

About Liam Cross

Liam Cross is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (17 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (9 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (6 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (350 citations), Social Psychology (209 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (96 citations), Clinical Psychology (136 citations) and Developmental Biology (14 citations). Liam Cross has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Gray Atherton, Martine Turgeon, Andrew D. Wilson, Sabrina Golonka, Natalie Sebanz, Susan X. Day, Satoshi Nakashima, Yuko Morimoto, Louise Connell and John Michael. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, PLoS ONE, Autism Research and Autism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact