Li Lu

4.8k citations
111 papers · 3.3k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Li Lu

102 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Li Lu
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 842
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 834
  • Developmental Neuroscience 125
  • Sensory Systems 119
  • Toxicology 80
Replace Emilio Casanova with:
Emilio Casanova Austria
Hélène Jeltsch‐David France
Faramarz Dehghani Germany
Sergio Schinelli Italy
Ling Pan China
Douglas A. Lappi United States
Kyungmin Lee South Korea
Jeffrey Theodore Henderson Canada
Xianyu Liu United States
Francesca Biagioni Italy
Li Lu relative to Emilio Casanova Austria Emilio Casanova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Emilio Casanova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li Lu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li Lu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li Lu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li Lu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li Lu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li Lu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li Lu. The network helps show where Li Lu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li Lu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li Lu Line = papers co-authored together Li Lu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014315
2 2018313
3 2021220
4 2011140
5 2010120
6 2020113
7 2015112
8 198996
9 200796
10 201384
11 200781
12 202170
13 201065
14 201965
15 201956
16 200453
17 200952
18 201952
19 200750
20 200945

About Li Lu

Li Lu is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience, Neurology and Cell Biology, having authored 111 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (7 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (6 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (5 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (5 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (842 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (834 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (125 citations), Sensory Systems (119 citations) and Toxicology (80 citations). Li Lu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Edvard Ingjald Moser, May‐Britt Moser, Kei M. Igarashi, Laura Lee Colgin, Albert Tsao, Cheng Wang, Jørgen Sugar, James J. Knierim, Chung Owyang and Dexter S. Louie. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Stem Cells, Scientific Reports, Nature and Nature Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact