Lev Weiner

142 papers receiving 6.5k citations

Peers

Lev Weiner
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 220
  • Biophysics 427
  • Inorganic Chemistry 931
  • Pharmacology 819
  • Organic Chemistry 1.4k
Replace Diane E. Cabelli with:
Diane E. Cabelli United States
Graeme R. Hanson Australia
David Leys United Kingdom
Nigel S. Scrutton United Kingdom
Christopher S. Foote United States
Daniel Mansuy France
Fei Mao China
Derek A. Pratt Canada
Chryssostomos Chatgilialoglu Italy
Charles Mioskowski France
Lev Weiner relative to Diane E. Cabelli United States Diane E. Cabelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Diane E. Cabelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lev Weiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lev Weiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lev Weiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lev Weiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lev Weiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lev Weiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lev Weiner. The network helps show where Lev Weiner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lev Weiner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lev Weiner Line = papers co-authored together Lev Weiner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 142 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009439
2 1996428
3 2001378
4 1998371
5 2000311
6 2004250
7 2010202
8 2005200
9 2005194
10 2005187
11 2001170
12 2009143
13 2000123
14 1993103
15 200295
16 200295
17 199793
18 198293
19 200591
20 199884

About Lev Weiner

Lev Weiner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Biophysics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 142 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electron Spin Resonance Studies (26 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (26 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (24 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (17 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (12 papers), Garlic and Onion Studies (11 papers), Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (9 papers) and Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (220 citations), Biophysics (427 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (931 citations), Pharmacology (819 citations) and Organic Chemistry (1.4k citations). Lev Weiner has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ronny Neumann, David Mirelman, Aharon Rabinkov, Meir Wilchek, Talia Miron, Violet Daniel, Ron Pinkus, Israel Silman, L. Konstantinovski and Mati Fridkin. Their work appears in journals such as FEBS Letters, Protein Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biochemistry and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact