L.E.T. Albuquerque
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian function and disorders
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Papers in
-
- Ovarian function and disorders 6
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 1
- Sperm and Testicular Function 1
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 6
- Co-authors
- Cristiane R Macedo (4 shared papers)L.O. Tso (4 shared papers)Régis B Andriolo (3 shared papers)Michael Costello (3 shared papers)Humberto Saconato (1 shared paper)Jane Marjoribanks (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3 papers)Fertility and Sterility (2 papers)Human Reproduction (1 paper)JBRA (1 paper)Revista Brasileira Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BrazilAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
L.E.T. Albuquerque
8 papers receiving 240 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Reproductive Medicine 212
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 164
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 97
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 29
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 26
Countries citing papers authored by L.E.T. Albuquerque
This map shows the geographic impact of L.E.T. Albuquerque's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.E.T. Albuquerque with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.E.T. Albuquerque more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L.E.T. Albuquerque
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.E.T. Albuquerque. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.E.T. Albuquerque. The network helps show where L.E.T. Albuquerque may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside L.E.T. Albuquerque, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 124 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 1 |
About L.E.T. Albuquerque
L.E.T. Albuquerque is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 8 papers that have together received 245 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (6 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (6 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Diverse Scientific Research Studies (1 paper), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper) and Sperm and Testicular Function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (212 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (164 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (97 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (26 citations). L.E.T. Albuquerque has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Cristiane R Macedo, L.O. Tso, Régis B Andriolo, Michael Costello, Humberto Saconato and Jane Marjoribanks. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Fertility and Sterility, Human Reproduction, JBRA and Revista Brasileira Ginecologia e Obstetrícia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.