Leni Dam

703 citations
19 papers · 445 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Leni Dam

16 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Leni Dam
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Language and Linguistics 263
  • Literature and Literary Theory 232
  • Linguistics and Language 76
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 119
  • Education 212
Replace Bonnie Adair‐Hauck with:
Bonnie Adair‐Hauck United States
Gillian Humphreys Hong Kong
Hitomi Masuhara United Kingdom
Keiko Sakui Japan
Joel M. Magogwe Botswana
Nick Andon Sweden
Denyze Toffoli France
Nae-Dong Yang Taiwan
Ayşe Akyel Türkiye
Agneta M.‐L. Svalberg United Kingdom
Leni Dam relative to Bonnie Adair‐Hauck United States Bonnie Adair‐Hauck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Bonnie Adair‐Hauck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leni Dam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leni Dam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leni Dam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leni Dam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leni Dam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leni Dam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leni Dam. The network helps show where Leni Dam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Leni Dam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leni Dam Line = papers co-authored together Leni Dam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1989198
2 201755
3 201739
4 198924
5 201719
6
From theory to classroom practice
199517
7 201015
8 199614
9 199013
10
Focus on Learning Rather than Teaching: Why and How? Papers from the International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language (IATEFL) Conference (Krakow, Poland, May 14-16, 1998).
200013
11 200913
12 201110
13 20185
14
Learner Autonomy: New Insights. = Autonomie de l'apprenant: nouvelles pistes.
20015
15
Learner autonomy in Japanese classrooms : an exchange of views
19982
16 20102
17 20091
18 20040
19 20170

About Leni Dam

Leni Dam is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Education, Linguistics and Language and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (10 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (9 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (3 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (1 paper), Education and Critical Thinking Development (1 paper), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (1 paper) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (263 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (232 citations), Linguistics and Language (76 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (119 citations) and Education (212 citations). Leni Dam has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Germany and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include David Little, Michael Breen, Dieter Wolff and Richard Smith. Their work appears in journals such as System, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Hong Kong University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact