Lena Krämer

1.4k citations
35 papers · 843 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Lena Krämer

34 papers receiving 825 citations

Peers

Lena Krämer
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Applied Psychology 238
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 102
  • Clinical Psychology 124
  • Cell Biology 91
  • Clinical Biochemistry 33
Replace Mohammad Mofatteh with:
Mohammad Mofatteh United Kingdom
Christina M. Armstrong United States
Irene Rebollo‐Mesa United Kingdom
Catherine Fillée Belgium
Catherine Massoubre France
Weiwei Chang China
Samantha Parker United States
Govindasamy Balasekaran Singapore
Bobby Stuijfzand United Kingdom
Lena Krämer relative to Mohammad Mofatteh United Kingdom Mohammad Mofatteh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
Mohammad Mofatteh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lena Krämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lena Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lena Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lena Krämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lena Krämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lena Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lena Krämer. The network helps show where Lena Krämer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lena Krämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lena Krämer Line = papers co-authored together Lena Krämer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019138
2 2016115
3 201486
4 201873
5 202165
6 201859
7 201838
8 201037
9 201431
10 202123
11 202023
12 202122
13 201918
14 201817
15 202316
16 202016
17 20238
18 20217
19 20226
20 20176

About Lena Krämer

Lena Krämer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 35 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (13 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers), Physical Activity and Health (4 papers) and Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (238 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (102 citations), Clinical Psychology (124 citations), Cell Biology (91 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (33 citations). Lena Krämer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Bengel, Reinhard Fuchs, Harald Baumeister, David Daniel Ebert, Almut Helmes, Johannes M. Herrmann, Felix Boos, Carina Groh, Harald Seelig and Jiaxi Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, International Journal of Legal Medicine, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Trials and Psychology and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact