Leah Sartorius
Impact in
- Physiology top 2%
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Neurology top 5%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 4
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 4
- Co-authors
- David M. Holtzman (4 shared papers)Anne M. Fagan (3 shared papers)Brian Mackey (3 shared papers)Steven M. Paul (3 shared papers)Kelly R. Bales (3 shared papers)Tanya Tenkova (3 shared papers)David F. Wozniak (2 shared papers)John W. Olney (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Neurology (2 papers)Brain Structure and Function (2 papers)Journal of Neurochemistry (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Experimental Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Leah Sartorius
9 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Leah Sartorius's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Physiology 892
- Neurology 175
- Biological Psychiatry 46
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 328
- Pharmacology 187
Countries citing papers authored by Leah Sartorius
This map shows the geographic impact of Leah Sartorius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leah Sartorius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leah Sartorius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leah Sartorius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leah Sartorius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leah Sartorius. The network helps show where Leah Sartorius may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leah Sartorius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apolipoprotein E isoform-dependent amyloid deposition and neuritic degeneration in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 732 |
| 2 | 2000 | 271 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 135 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 110 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 58 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 47 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 10 | What triggers requests for ethics | 2001 | 1 |
About Leah Sartorius
Leah Sartorius is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (892 citations), Neurology (175 citations), Biological Psychiatry (46 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (328 citations) and Pharmacology (187 citations). Leah Sartorius has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David M. Holtzman, Anne M. Fagan, Brian Mackey, Steven M. Paul, Kelly R. Bales, Tanya Tenkova, David F. Wozniak, John W. Olney, Daniel W. McKeel and Maia Parsadanian. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Neurology, Brain Structure and Function, Journal of Neurochemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Experimental Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.