L. Paut

508 citations
9 papers · 491 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

L. Paut

9 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

L. Paut
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 207
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 94
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 285
  • Social Psychology 209
  • Reproductive Medicine 62
Replace Romeo Caffé with:
Romeo Caffé Netherlands
H. Widmer France
Y. Sawaki Japan
I Merchenthaler United States
B. Dupouy France
S. Pretel United States
Yoshitaka Tamada Japan
A Gouget France
Bàrbara Planas United States
Yasuhiko Ibata Japan
L. Paut relative to Romeo Caffé Netherlands Romeo Caffé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Romeo Caffé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Paut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Paut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Paut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Paut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Paut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Paut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Paut. The network helps show where L. Paut may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside L. Paut, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Paut Line = papers co-authored together L. Paut links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1986173
2 1983140
3 198458
4 198649
5 198526
6 198616
7 198016
8
[Genetic study of paradoxical sleep in mice. Connection with coloration genes].
19807
9
Etude genetique du sommeil paradoxal chez la souris. I. Liaison possible avec les genes de coloration.
19806

About L. Paut

L. Paut is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper) and Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (207 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (94 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (285 citations), Social Psychology (209 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (62 citations). L. Paut has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Marcel Tappaz, D.T. Theodosis, Marion Wassef, J.F. Pujol, WH Oertel, Anne Bérod, Mireille Chat, Bruce G. Jenks, B.M.L. Verburg-van Kemenade and Olivier Bosler. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, Brain Research, Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, Endocrinology and Brain Research Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact