L. Elit

1.6k citations
57 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 6
    • Cancer Risks and Factors 6
    • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 16
    • Uterine Myomas and Treatments 5

L. Elit

53 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

L. Elit
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Reproductive Medicine 494
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 357
  • Oncology 365
  • Genetics 224
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 126
Replace William J. Lowery with:
William J. Lowery United States
Eva Chalas United States
Eloise Chapman‐Davis United States
Katina Robison United States
Carol Kosary United States
Melissa K. Frey United States
Ramey D. Littell United States
Wendy R. Brewster United States
Matthew Schlumbrecht United States
Paula S. Lee United States
L. Elit relative to William J. Lowery United States William J. Lowery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
William J. Lowery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Elit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Elit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Elit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Elit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Elit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Elit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Elit. The network helps show where L. Elit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. Elit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Elit Line = papers co-authored together L. Elit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200198
2 201395
3 199992
4 201388
5 201176
6 200271
7 200668
8 201060
9
Delayed delivery of second twin: report of four cases and review of the literature.
199257
10 198941
11 200841
12 199733
13 200931
14 201130
15 200725
16 199423
17 200623
18 200323
19 200917
20 200417

About L. Elit

L. Elit is a scholar working on Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics and Surgery, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (16 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (14 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (9 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (7 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers) and Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (494 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (357 citations), Oncology (365 citations), Genetics (224 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (126 citations). L. Elit has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Steven A. Narod, Gregory R. Pond, Mary Jane Esplen, Amit M. Oza, Hsien Seow, Mark N. Levine, Kate Butler, Erin O’Leary, Alan Bocking and Cynthia Kenyon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Psycho-Oncology and Familial Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact