L. C. Ling

838 citations
8 papers · 729 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 2
    • Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 2
    • Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management 2
    • Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 1

L. C. Ling

8 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers

L. C. Ling
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Biochemistry 114
  • Food Science 353
  • Sensory Systems 78
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 18
  • Plant Science 303
Replace Dale R. Black with:
Dale R. Black United States
J. F. Guymon United States
Matthias Güntert Germany
Henk Maarse Netherlands
K. E. Murray Australia
Randolph H Dyer United States
J. G. Harris United States
Matthias Guentert United States
Albrecht Junker Germany
R. R. Forrey United States
L. C. Ling relative to Dale R. Black United States Dale R. Black's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Dale R. Black · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. C. Ling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. C. Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. C. Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. C. Ling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. C. Ling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. C. Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. C. Ling. The network helps show where L. C. Ling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside L. C. Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. C. Ling Line = papers co-authored together L. C. Ling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1969247
2 1971214
3 197185
4 197369
5
Volatile compounds of tomato fruit and plant parts: relationship and biogenesis
199352
6
Fresh tomato volatiles: composition and sensory studies
198938
7 196822
8 19692

About L. C. Ling

L. C. Ling is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Pharmacology, Biomedical Engineering and Organic Chemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (2 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (2 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (1 paper), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1 paper), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (1 paper) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (114 citations), Food Science (353 citations), Sensory Systems (78 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (18 citations) and Plant Science (303 citations). L. C. Ling has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ron G. Buttery, D. G. Guadagni, Richard Seifert, J. L. BOMBEN, Robert A. Flath, Roy Teranishi and T. R. Mon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Europe PMC (PubMed Central).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact