Kylie Bennett

3.2k citations
51 papers · 2.2k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Kylie Bennett

50 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Kylie Bennett
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Applied Psychology 868
  • Clinical Psychology 530
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 273
  • Social Psychology 396
  • General Health Professions 275
Replace E Bethan Davies with:
E Bethan Davies United Kingdom
Justin F. Hummer United States
Andrea K. Graham United States
Kenneth R. Weingardt United States
Katherine Petrie Australia
Dan J. Neal United States
Sarah Kirk United Kingdom
Amit Baumel Israel
Anne H. Berman Sweden
Akash R. Wasil United States
Kylie Bennett relative to E Bethan Davies United Kingdom E Bethan Davies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
E Bethan Davies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kylie Bennett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kylie Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kylie Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kylie Bennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kylie Bennett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kylie Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kylie Bennett. The network helps show where Kylie Bennett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kylie Bennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kylie Bennett Line = papers co-authored together Kylie Bennett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012194
2 2016172
3 2013137
4 2012121
5 2009117
6 2013106
7 201297
8 201385
9 201671
10
Predictors of adherence among community users of a cognitive behavior therapy website.
200871
11 201057
12 200956
13 201554
14 201752
15 201452
16 201447
17 201844
18 201444
19 201044
20 201542

About Kylie Bennett

Kylie Bennett is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (28 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (868 citations), Clinical Psychology (530 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (273 citations), Social Psychology (396 citations) and General Health Professions (275 citations). Kylie Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen M Griffiths, Helen Christensen, Amelia Gulliver, Louise M. Farrer, Anthony Bennett, Philip J. Batterham, Andrew Mackinnon, Alison L. Calear, Julia Reynolds and Jade KY Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, BMC Psychiatry, JMIR Mental Health, Trials and Internet Interventions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact