Kyle S. Davis

813 citations
7 papers · 567 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 7
    • Social and Intergroup Psychology 3
    • Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research 1
    • African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues 1
    • Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies 1

Kyle S. Davis

7 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

Kyle S. Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Social Psychology 468
  • Gender Studies 208
  • Reproductive Medicine 82
  • Clinical Psychology 169
  • Sociology and Political Science 270
Replace Renae C. Mitchell with:
Renae C. Mitchell United States
Emmie Matsuno United States
Rhonda J. Factor United States
Louis Lindley United States
Nicola Nardelli Italy
Marie-Anne Issa United States
Jayleen Leon United States
Samantha Pflum United States
Elizabeth Geiger United States
Joy S. Whitman United States
Kyle S. Davis relative to Renae C. Mitchell United States Renae C. Mitchell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Renae C. Mitchell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle S. Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle S. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle S. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle S. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle S. Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle S. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle S. Davis. The network helps show where Kyle S. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Kyle S. Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle S. Davis Line = papers co-authored together Kyle S. Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown

About Kyle S. Davis

Kyle S. Davis is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Reproductive Medicine, Gender Studies and General Health Professions, having authored 7 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (1 paper), Homelessness and Social Issues (1 paper), African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (1 paper) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (468 citations), Gender Studies (208 citations), Reproductive Medicine (82 citations), Clinical Psychology (169 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (270 citations). Kyle S. Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Paz Galupo and Renae C. Mitchell. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, Journal of Bisexuality, Journal of LGBT Youth, Archives of Sexual Behavior and Psychology and Sexuality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact